|All materials used on this page are used as "fair use."
Disclaimer: The views expressed in these articles, videos, and links on this website and web pages are
the sole responsibilities of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of
GeorgeHollandForCongress.com The contents of these articles are the sole responsibility of the
authors. GeorgeHollandforCongress.com will not be responsible or liable for any inaccurate or
incorrect statements contained in these articles, videos or links.
George Holland For Congress
Rushville, IN 46173
REMEMBER THE U.S.S. LIBERTY!
2020 - National Health Care For All!-2020
God and George Holland For Congress Support National
Health Care For All! It's the Christian thing to do!
Please read and share with others, this excellent paper of why everyone should
have single payer insurance or universal health care coverage.
Medicare for all is cheaper!
BIDEN REJECTS MEDICARE FOR ALL
(God and George Holland For Congress Support National Health Care For All!
It's the Christian thing to do!)
March 30, 2020
COVID-19 Proves It: We Need Medicare-for-All
by Ashar Foley
MEDICARE IN AMERICA: Real Health Care Requires the Repeal of the Insurance Mandate
By Kevin Zeese
Global Research, March 26, 2012
It’s Our Economy, the organization I co-direct with Margaret Flowers, MD, Single Payer Action and 50
doctors filed an amicus brief in HHS v. Florida, the challenge to the Affordable Care Act being heard in
the Supreme Court this week.
We support health care reform but oppose the insurance mandate. Merely removing two words from
existing law will achieve the President's stated goals of universal, affordable and guaranteed health
care. By removing the words “over 65” from the Medicare law, every American will have health care
based on a proven public health care model that has been in existence since 1965. This will control
costs and immediately provide health care to everyone in the United States.
Forcing Americans to buy insurance is both unconstitutional and bad policy. Even the most favorable
estimates of the Affordable Care Act predict that tens of millions of Americans will not have health
insurance when it is fully implemented in 2019. The number of employers offering health benefits will
decline under the ACA pushing employees into the individual insurance market where coverage is
skimpier and more expensive. The cost of premiums continues to rise and insurance coverage
continues to shrink, putting patients at risk of personal bankruptcy when they suffer a serious accident
The United States already spends enough to provide health care to all. As the amicus brief states:
“Studies conducted by the nonpartisan General Accounting Office and the nonpartisan Congressional
Budget Office have consistently concluded that if a national single payer system were implemented in
the United States, administrative cost-savings alone would be enough to guarantee universal
coverage without increasing overall healthcare spending.”
In addition, improved Medicare for all will slow the growth in the cost of health care. The cost of health
care under Medicare is growing more slowly than private insurance-based health care, despite the fact
that it deals with America’s elderly and disabled populations, groups that generally need more health
care services. Unlike private insurance, under Medicare the increased cost is not due to
administrative costs and bureaucracy. Medicare’s administrative costs have been consistently about
2% while private insurance is 16% administrative costs.
Instead, the ACA builds and expands the system of private insurance. This system is among the least
efficient of any healthcare system currently operating in developed nations. The brief states “In 2009,
28 healthcare expenditures accounted for 17.4 percent of GDP in the United States, compared with
only 9.6 percent in the average OECD [The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development]
nation” and “measured per capita, healthcare expenditures in the United States ‘are by far the highest
among OECD countries.’”
Medicare provides health services that people like, as the brief points out: “In addition to achieving
universal coverage for Americans aged 65 and older and maintaining consistently low administrative
costs, Medicare is also highly rated by senior citizens who are its primary beneficiaries – 51 percent of
whom give their health insurance an ‘excellent” rating.’”
If the US Congress had considered an evidence-based approach to health reform instead of writing a
bill that funnels more wealth to insurance companies that deny and restrict care, it would have been a
no brainer to adopt improved Medicare for all. All the data points to a single payer system as the only
way to accomplish universal health care and control health care costs.
It is also bad precedent to allow the federal government to mandate all Americans buy a corporate
product. This takes corporate welfare to new levels of extreme. If this is upheld, will a future
president facing an economic crisis require Americans to buy cars made in the USA – of course, with a
government subsidy? Or, will the pension crisis in the United States be ‘solved’ by setting up a
pension exchange of JP Morgan, Bank of America, Well Fargo, Chase and Citibank and require
Americans to buy a federally subsidized pension from Wall Street?
Finally, an improved Medicare for all system will give everyone in the United States the greatest
control of their own healthcare. The insurance industry will be removed from between doctors and
patients. Doctors will not have to convince an insurance, profit-minded, bureaucrat to pay for a
treatment. And, people will no longer be threatened with increased premiums, decreased coverage
and financial ruin caused by an insurance industry that puts profits before people.
We filed the amicus brief because forcing people to purchase a flawed product, private health
insurance, is not necessary and will not achieve the goals of universal, guaranteed and affordable
health care. There is a health care model in the US already that will achieve these goals - that's
improved Medicare for all. Medicare for all is constitutional and simple to attain - just drop a few words
from existing law and we will be on the path to joining the rest of the civilized world when it comes to
Kevin Zeese is co-director of Its Our Economy (www.ItsOurEconomy.US) and is an organizer of the
National Occupation of Washington, DC (www.NOWDC.org).
It's shameful to this Christian,USAF-NATO veteran that the U.S. is the largest producer and
exporter of weapons and weapons systems. Killing people is big business! It is also shameful
that the U.S. is the only industrialized nation without national health care for all !
Please read: Why the Demand for ‘Medicare for All’ Won’t Go Away And why these days of
injustice must come to an end
Repealing Obamacare? Here’s a Better Idea – Medicare for All
In closing National Health Care for All: My beautiful wife of nearly sixty years, Janice, recently
died with Alzheimer's. Patients with Alzheimers Disease live in a physically and mentally
tortured world. Alzheimer's is a vicious disease. The patient's ultimate death is horrific
suffering. Basically, Medicare does not pay any nursing home costs for this treatment. This
caregiving at home is an extreme emotional and financial hardship on most families.
I propose that the $5 billion a year the U.S. taxpayer gives to Zionist Israel, be used here at
home to start establishing Regional Medical Centers for the diagnosis, care and treatment of
Americans suffering from neuro-degenerative diseases. It's the Christian thing to do! Let's
make "National Health Care for All" a reality! Let's Put America, not Zionist Israel First!