Reproduced for "fair use"
Bolton’s Past Advocacy for Israel at US Expense Heralds Dangerous New Era in
Geopolitics

Notorious war hawk John Bolton – who has long been vying for a position in Trump’s administration –
has been especially eager to work with a president with minimal foreign policy knowledge or experience,
allowing him maximum effect in achieving his policy goals.
By Whitney Webb
Global Research, March 28, 2018
MintPress News 27 March 2018

Url of this article:
https://www.globalresearch.ca/boltons-past-advocacy-for-israel-at-us-expense-heralds-dangerous-new-
era-in-geopolitics/5633883

This article is Part I of a series exploring the past of soon-to-be National Security Adviser John Bolton
and what his recent appointment will mean for U.S. foreign policy, with a focus on the Middle East, Latin
America, and the Koreas. Part I explores Bolton’s history of putting the interests of the Israeli government
ahead of those of the U.S., as well as what his appointment means for Israel’s current preparations for a
“three front” war and American involvement in that war.

Last Thursday, President Trump announced that former UN ambassador John Bolton, once called the
“most dangerous man” in the entire George W. Bush administration, would replace H.R. McMaster as
national security adviser, making him the man in charge of what the President sees and hears regarding
issues of national security. Bolton will officially take over McMaster’s post on April 9.

The appointment was not surprising. Indeed, earlier this month, MintPress reported that McMaster was
soon to be replaced – largely at the behest of billionaire Republican donor and militant Zionist Sheldon
Adelson – and that Bolton was a top contender for that position, largely due to Bolton’s reputation as a
“stalwart friend of Israel” and his frequent calls for military action against Iran, Israel’s regional arch-rival.

Yet, Bolton’s appointment – placed in the greater context of recent changes to Trump’s cabinet – is a
harrowing portent for those opposed to more U.S. regime-change wars. Mike Pompeo, another
proponent of war with Iran, is set to take over the State Department; and Gina Haspel — whose
nickname “Bloody Gina” speaks to her history of overseeing torture and depreciating human life — is
slated to take over for Pompeo as head of the CIA. Bolton completes the triumvirate and his ultra-
hawkishness speaks to the President’s posturing for war against not one but several countries — with
hopes of building a unipolar world with the United States as its sole leader, a perverse distortion of his
isolationist campaign promise “America First.”

Though he is just one of the war hawks now roosting in the Trump administration, Bolton is arguably more
dangerous than all the rest due to his bellicose rhetoric, unilateral decision-making, and his “kiss up, kick
down” style of interaction with superiors and colleagues, allowing him to be remarkably effective in
getting his way. Not only that, but Bolton – who has long been vying for a position in the Trump
administration – has been admittedly eager to work with a president with minimal foreign policy
knowledge or experience — obviously true in Trump’s case — as it would allow him to have maximum
effect in achieving his policy goals. Bolton has already exercised great influence over the president,
reportedly adding statements to Trump’s speech at the United Nations without the knowledge of Trump’s
staff.

Thus, Bolton is set to have a disproportionately influential role in the Trump administration, making it
essential to examine what his appointment will likely mean for U.S. government policy, particularly
regarding geopolitical “hotspots” such as the Middle East and the Koreas.

Freelancing for Israel

Url of this article:
https://www.globalresearch.ca/boltons-past-advocacy-for-israel-at-us-expense-heralds-dangerous-new-
era-in-geopolitics/5633883

This article is Part I of a series exploring the past of soon-to-be National Security Adviser John Bolton
and what his recent appointment will mean for U.S. foreign policy, with a focus on the Middle East, Latin
America, and the Koreas. Part I explores Bolton’s history of putting the interests of the Israeli government
ahead of those of the U.S., as well as what his appointment means for Israel’s current preparations for a
“three front” war and American involvement in that war.

Last Thursday, President Trump announced that former UN ambassador John Bolton, once called the
“most dangerous man” in the entire George W. Bush administration, would replace H.R. McMaster as
national security adviser, making him the man in charge of what the President sees and hears regarding
issues of national security. Bolton will officially take over McMaster’s post on April 9.

The appointment was not surprising. Indeed, earlier this month, MintPress reported that McMaster was
soon to be replaced – largely at the behest of billionaire Republican donor and militant Zionist Sheldon
Adelson – and that Bolton was a top contender for that position, largely due to Bolton’s reputation as a
“stalwart friend of Israel” and his frequent calls for military action against Iran, Israel’s regional arch-rival.

Yet, Bolton’s appointment – placed in the greater context of recent changes to Trump’s cabinet – is a
harrowing portent for those opposed to more U.S. regime-change wars. Mike Pompeo, another
proponent of war with Iran, is set to take over the State Department; and Gina Haspel — whose
nickname “Bloody Gina” speaks to her history of overseeing torture and depreciating human life — is
slated to take over for Pompeo as head of the CIA. Bolton completes the triumvirate and his ultra-
hawkishness speaks to the President’s posturing for war against not one but several countries — with
hopes of building a unipolar world with the United States as its sole leader, a perverse distortion of his
isolationist campaign promise “America First.”

Though he is just one of the war hawks now roosting in the Trump administration, Bolton is arguably more
dangerous than all the rest due to his bellicose rhetoric, unilateral decision-making, and his “kiss up, kick
down” style of interaction with superiors and colleagues, allowing him to be remarkably effective in
getting his way. Not only that, but Bolton – who has long been vying for a position in the Trump
administration – has been admittedly eager to work with a president with minimal foreign policy
knowledge or experience — obviously true in Trump’s case — as it would allow him to have maximum
effect in achieving his policy goals. Bolton has already exercised great influence over the president,
reportedly adding statements to Trump’s speech at the United Nations without the knowledge of Trump’s
staff.

Thus, Bolton is set to have a disproportionately influential role in the Trump administration, making it
essential to examine what his appointment will likely mean for U.S. government policy, particularly
regarding geopolitical “hotspots” such as the Middle East and the Koreas.

Freelancing for Israel

Though the domestic reaction to Bolton’s appointment was rather mixed, top ministers of the right-wing
Israeli government lavished praise upon the soon-to-be National Security Adviser, calling him “one of the
most outstanding” allies to Israel in U.S. politics, and a “true friend” to the Jewish state who brings “great
experience and original thinking” to “the most sympathetic administration toward Israel of all time.”

View image on TwitterView image on Twitter

John Bolton

@AmbJohnBolton
#TBT to Monday when I was in Israel to receive the "Guardian of Zion" award from @BarIlanU's Ingeborg
Rennert Center for Jerusalem Studies.

12:33 PM - Jun 1, 2017
303
181 people are talking about this
Twitter Ads info and privacy
Indeed, Bolton’s ties to Israel are as deep as they are long-standing — so deep that some have posited
that his commitment to extreme Zionism has led him to betray the national interest of his own country on
more than one occasion.

For instance, Danny Gillerman, the former Israeli ambassador to the UN, recently noted that Bolton, when
serving in the Bush administration, was prone to “direct fire on his own forces,” —  i.e., the U.S.
government — in order to advance the goals of the Israeli government. Gillerman, speaking on the Israeli
radio program Galei Tzahal this past Sunday, stated:

[W]hen the State Department — then headed by Condoleezza Rice, who wasn’t so friendly to Israel even
though the Bush Administration was very friendly — was about to either make a decision, or not abstain,
or not veto, or to advance something that was against us [Israel], Bolton would call me, and he would say
‘Danny, you’ve got to call the prime minister right now, in order for him to phone the president to stop
this.’”

In addition, Bolton garnered a reputation – as well as the ire of State Department officials at the time –
for violating State Department protocol by acting unilaterally in matters of diplomacy to negotiate privately
in Israel. The New York Times reported in 2005 that Bolton traveled to Israel without the required State
Department clearance in 2003 and 2004 in a direct effort to undermine then-Secretary of State Colin
Powell. As journalist Gareth Porter noted:

[A]t the very moment that Powell was saying administration policy was not to attack Iran, Bolton was
working with the Israelis to lay the groundwork for just such a war.”

Bolton’s numerous private and unannounced visits to Israel entailed meetings with officials of Mossad,
Israel’s intelligence service, including Meir Dagan, then Mossad’s director.

Despite his flagrant violations of government rules, Bolton remained the main liaison between the U.S.
and Israeli governments under Bush.

Bolton has pressured Israeli officials to attack Iran even when calling for such an attack was not the U.S.
government’s position. According to Shaul Mofaz, former Israeli defense minister, Bolton “tried to
convince me that Israel needs to attack Iran,” which Mofaz recently asserted was not “a smart move – not
on the part of the Americans today or anyone else until the threat is real.”

Billionaire Adelson gets his way


Sheldon Adelson with PM Benjamin Netanyahu

Bolton’s commitment to the Israeli state has manifested in other ways. For instance, he has remained a
constant critic of Palestine’s right to self-determination, calling an independent Palestinian state a plot “of
Israel’s opponents to weaken and encircle the Jewish state.” Bolton has called for the Gaza strip and the
West Bank to be given to Egypt and Jordan, respectively. This approach, nicknamed the “Three State
solution,” would eliminate any hopes for Palestinian sovereignty by giving Palestinian territories to two U.
S.-allied countries that enjoy cordial relations with Israel, making this solution preferable for Israel hard-
liners that wish to see an end to the Palestinian Authority and Hamas.

Bolton has also praised President Trump’s recent decision to recognize Jerusalem as Israel’s capital,
and relocate the U.S. embassy in Israel accordingly – a policy change allegedly orchestrated by pro-
Israel Republican mega-donor Sheldon Adelson — as an “injection of reality.” In addition, he has strongly
promoted the construction of illegal settlements on Palestinian land, stating recently that Israelis “ought to
be able to build houses wherever they want to, including all of the lands of Judea and Samaria [Palestine’
s West Bank].”


Bruce Baird
@drbairdonline
24 Mar
"At every turn, Zionist Neocon (aka ZioCon) John Bolton has shilled for Israel - no matter the cost or
consequence to the safety of the American people."https://www.youtube.com/watch?
time_continue=393&v=w6zEitguxLI …


Bruce Baird
@drbairdonline
John Bolton says “Well, I know my strong view is that Jews ought to be able to build houses wherever
they want to, including all of the lands of Judea and Samaria.” pic.twitter.com/fnF6eE10Bw

7:33 AM - Mar 24, 2018

33
73 people are talking about this
Twitter Ads info and privacy
Given his embrace of extremist Zionism, it is no surprise that Bolton has found himself replacing H.R.
McMaster, whose ouster was orchestrated by billionaire Republican donor Sheldon Adelson. Bolton has
long been promoted by Adelson, as the latter personally intervened to keep Bolton in contact with the
Trump throughout his presidency and had lobbied soon after Trump’s election to have Bolton appointed
to his cabinet. Like the embassy move to Jerusalem, Adelson has again gotten his wish.

Adelson’s push to have Bolton installed comes at a crucial time, as Israel is currently preparing for war on
“three fronts” — Palestine, Lebanon, and Syria – and is actively lobbying for American aid and
involvement in launching that war. With Bolton in the Trump administration, along with numerous other
staunch Israel allies in key government positions, Israel will likely get that aid in addition to American
troops fighting alongside them, even if Israel is the aggressor in the imminent conflict.

The timing of Bolton’s appointment as National Security Adviser is also noteworthy, as it comes little over
a month before the U.S. embassy is set to move to Jerusalem, when tensions between Israel, Palestine
and its neighbors will be at their highest and when a war is most likely to break out. Bolton is set to
ensure strong U.S. support for any Israeli military action that takes place during this time, even though
Israel is explicitly planning to target civilians and civilian infrastructure.

*

Whitney Webb is a staff writer for MintPress News who has written for several news organizations in both
English and Spanish; her stories have been featured on ZeroHedge, the Anti-Media, and 21st Century
Wire among others. She currently lives in Southern Chile.

Disclaimer: The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). The Centre for Research
on Globalization will not be responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect statement in this article.
Copyright © Whitney Webb, Global Research, 2018